Sign in or register
for additional privileges

daddylabyrinth: a digital lyric memoir

Steven Wingate, Author
MILITARY MAN, page 1 of 8
Previous page on path     Next page on path

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

AR 615-368: UNDESIRABILITY


I supposed that failing to get dressed when his superior officer, Charles V. Ickes, ordered him to was enough to convince the U.S. Army that Recruit Thomas J. Wingate wasn't going to fit in. 

This notice, dated 21 November 1949, came about three weeks after the incident. It looks as if the Army was ready to discharge him because of "undesirability," which makes complete sense. But how did he get from there to a court-martial? 

I don't get it. He must have pissed off somebody in the brig. According to the U.S. Army Medical Department, Office of Medical History, the Army had its internal battles over how best to discharge the undesired. Maybe it was simply easier to court-martial him than it was to kick him out through 615-368. Here's what the Office of Medical History has to say (emphasis mine). 


AR 615-368 became the direct descendant of section VIII and dealt with "habits and traits of character" which serve to render retention in the service undesirable and those who were "disqualified physically or in character through misconduct." Individuals discharged under this regulation received a blue discharge, unless the reviewing authority determined that an honorable discharge was to be given under AR 615-369.


The next revision of AR 615-368, issued on 7 March 1945, provided, as previously, for the elimination of enlisted personnel with undesirable habits and traits of character as follows: "Psychopathic personality manifested by antisocial or amoral trends, criminalism, chronic alcoholism, drug addiction, pathological lying or sexual misconduct in the service."


There was much dissatisfaction with these administrative discharge procedures, regardless of the need for such action. The psychiatrist was unhappy because of the considerable time required to evaluate the individual, to submit a certificate, and, when necessary, to appear as a witness. Unit commanders were unhappy because the officers comprising the "Section VIII" board were taken away from their primary mission of training. Also, many senior officers believed that administrative separation reflected adversely upon command and leadership ability. This belief was one of the major reasons why unit commanders attempted to use medical channels to rid themselves of soldiers who should have been administratively discharged. Other unit commanders believed that since the Medical Department, especially the psychiatrist, was so closely concerned, it should be a medical problem. Yet, in effect, the administrative procedure was an administrative problem and properly belonged in the domain of the unit commander.


Sometimes, when you have to get rid of somebody who's been a pain in the ass, you have to pick the method that is the least time-consuming to all concerned. Maybe the court-martial was simply the easiest way to go. Maybe he wasn't crazy enough for the Army to call him Section VIII, so this was the best way to get him out and mark him as UNDESIRABLE to society as a whole. 


Yeah, he must have pissed somebody off in the brig. Sounds like him. 


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "AR 615-368: UNDESIRABILITY"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path MILITARY MAN, page 1 of 8 Next page on path